IP expert says Nintendo probably doesn't own patents strong enough to "prevent Pocketpair from making Palworld," and this "may boil down to nothing but bullying"
Sep. 21, 2024The House of Mario can be a scary place
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.
After months of will they / won’t they,Nintendo and The Pokemon Company have filed a lawsuit against Palworld developer Pocketpairfor alleged patent infringement. But, one industry intellectual property expert says it’s “unlikely Nintendo owns any valid patents that are so powerful as to prevent Pocketpair from makingPalworld.”
Speaking onTwitter, former Blizzard consultant and author of the popularFOSS Patents blogFlorian Mueller weighs in on the situation and then some. While Mueller admits the situation is “tricky,” he goes on to say that “it may boil down to nothing but bullying by a frustrated incumbent who hates a successful newcomer.
“It looks like they are not suing over creative rights relating to how Palworld characters look, though that is what they originally appeared to be concerned about,” he says. “Patents cover technical inventions, except for U.S. design patents.
“In Japan it appears that they don’t call design rights ‘patents’ and this means they must be suing over software patents that will have nothing to do with what Palworld looks like. Those could be patents on, for instance, 3D image rendering. Such techniques can be used to make something that looks like Pokemon and they can also be used to make something that looks like Warcraft.”
Mueller goes on to say it’s unlikely that Nintendo owns any patents strong enough to “prevent Pocketpair from making Palworld.” That’s partly because most of them can be worked around by using a different technique to achieve the same effect or something close enough.
“Small and young companies like Pocketpair don’t own patents over which they can countersue, but sometimes they acquire them so they have leverage,” Mueller adds. “Pocketpair could try to buy some patents on the market that can be asserted against Nintendo for retaliatory purposes.”
Ultimately, a challenge many people are facing right now - Mueller included - is a lack of information. Nintendo’s announcement doesn’t go into specifics, and evenPocketpair has said it’s waiting to hearwhat patents it hasactuallyallegedly infringed.
Sign up to the GamesRadar+ Newsletter
Weekly digests, tales from the communities you love, and more
What could be ahead, though, is a rather long road. Mueller says arguing the case in Japan makes sense as both companies are local, but a loss for Pocketpair wouldn’t prohibit it from offering the game to the rest of the world – “So if they wanted to take it off the US market, they’d have to sue in a US court,” Mueller says. That doesn’t mean, however, that Nintendo wouldn’t do that. “It’s possible that Nintendo is totally prepared to escalate further,” he adds.
Bad news. Another top analyst says Nintendo’s “feared” legal team wouldn’t sue Palworld unless it was confident of victory.
Iain joins the GamesRadar team as Deputy News Editor following stints at PCGamesN and PocketGamer.Biz, with some freelance for Kotaku UK, RockPaperShotgun, and VG24/7 thrown in for good measure. When not helping Ali run the news team, he can be found digging into communities for stories – the sillier the better. When he isn’t pillaging the depths of Final Fantasy 14 for a swanky new hat, you’ll find him amassing an army of Pokemon plushies.
A mysterious Palworld update appears to make a change designed to get around the survival game’s legal battle with Nintendo
Five years later, PUBG creator PlayerUnknown finally reveals his massive open-world survival game projects, aiming for “realistic worlds thousands of kilometers wide” across three games
Dev behind new Doki Doki Literature Club-style psychological horror says it’s not “for those with weak hearts,” but with 98% positive Steam reviews, I’m not sure I can stay away
